‘'A
mountain range of debris in which our narrator introduces himself, the colors,
and the book thief,' says the narrator."
The
narrator or Death quickly became my favorite character in the series and his
beginning monologue is one of my favorites, for, how he wrote the color
representation of the dead was very unique. However, he is no grim reaper. He
is the kinder and gentler version who shows sympathy for his victims. Yet, he
urges people to accept that everyone is going to die.
"It's
enough to state that at some point, I'll be standing over you, as genially as
possible. I shall hold your soul in my arms. A color will cling to my shoulder.
I'll softly carry you away."
And his
resentment for human behavior and its cruelty is what resonated with me and I
often thought back to this line whilst reading the book and in real life as
well.
“They're
the ones I can't tolerate looking at, despite my best efforts on several
occasions. I purposefully search for colors to divert my attention away from
them, but now and then, I see the ones who are left behind collapsing among the
jigsaw puzzle of recognition, sadness, and astonishment. Their souls have been
pierced. Their hearts have been pounded.”
When I
initially started reading the book I went in blind so I didn’t know that it was
based in Nazis Germany.
We are
immediately struck by the tragedy of Liesel's brother, who died on the route to
their foster parents' house. And we're told that the color chosen for the
funeral was "something white." 'Of the dazzling variety.' Liesel
steals a book from one of the gravediggers at her brother's funeral while he is
being buried. Despite her illiteracy, Liesel's reading of the book signifies
the beginning of her education, her bonding with her stepfather, and her exposure
to the world of words, books, and stories and its power, especially given the
Nazis’ evident intent to destroy them.
Final Thoughts:
The
antagonists are the subject of this story. Zusak thinks that you are aware of
the Jewish fight and misery. He assumes you care about them and are appalled on
their behalf, so he doesn't spend much time eliciting an emotion you're
supposed to feel.
So, you can
imagine how I would feel. How can I consider myself one of the "good
guys" when I don't stand up for others? Shouldn't I have questioned people
when they blame someone with proof? Shouldn't I inquire as to how he or she is
so sure? How did he/she get to such conclusions about people? Isn't it true
that I should have challenged this individual? Couldn't I have pushed her to
question her to show her research or to consider facts and ethics?
No. I don't
because I don't want to raise any complications or stir up any controversy.
If you enjoy reading novels and books, be sure to check out our review on;
📘 Digital Fortress - by Dan Brown - "A code that could kill you."
📘 All the Bright Places - by Jennifer Niven's - "A heartbreaking and beautiful novel about grief and redemption."
📘 The Folk of the Air Trilogy - by Holly Black - "A true story of Adventure, Love, and Survival."
📘 Divergent Trilogy - by Veronica Roth - "The Most Anticipated Book of all Time."
📘 The Alchemist - by Paulo Coelho - “A Masterpiece of Fiction.”
Will definitely give this book a read. Thanks for the review!
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome :) I'm glad you like it.
DeleteDeath is literally my favorite character too. 😂
ReplyDelete